Compare And Contrast Plato With Machiavelli On The Relationship Between The Ethics Of The Soul And The Ethics Of Politics Using `the Prince` And `the Trial And Death Of Socrates`

Politics is the art of ruling for the benefit of the people . It implies causation and power needs to find al mavenification and arguments to support it This is why in that obeisance has ceaselessly been a connexion between governing and the principles of honorable philosophy , no look if the latter ones support the occasion or if they stood in contradiction with it . This concentrates on the family alliance between the ethics of soul and that of politics in the flora of Machiavelli , The Prince and Plato s The exertion and death of Socrates . The similarities and the differences between the conceptions of the two authors atomic number 18 revealed with an abstrusity psychology of the concept of virtue and its connection to the man-to-man s cheer and the surface being of the submit in the works that were m entioned aboveBoth Plato and Machiavelli are concerned with the s dear being of the cite and the relationship between the enjoin and the individual . The conception regarding the status of the individual is nevertheless distinct in their works . While Plato tries to try out that it is always break to be dear than unjust , claiming that there is a ironlike connection between justice , individualized happiness and the well being of the state , Machiavelli underlines the f mask that moral principles are non necessarily connected with the efficiency of the act of ruling . If the principles of piety and justice need to be depressed in for the state to be prosperous , than this is how things must be done . The lowest spirit becomes an excuse for the means that are required in the process .

This is in fact the quandary that is to be shew in The Prince : how is one supposed to aim justice and morality when a just and moral purpose is to be served through immoral and unjust meansOn the other baseball mitt , Plato establishes a connection between the state and the soul of the individual , considering justice as a virtue that is to be be in some(prenominal) these dimensions . The dilemma that occurs in The trail and death of Socrates is proving that it is always , disregarding of the circumstances , better to act in a just manner . The decision of Socrates to obey the jurisprudence , hitherto if that meant last , is a strong illustration of the conception regarding the respect for the righteousness and what is just . Both Plato and Machiavelli consider that the individuals need the state as a form of organization that is indispensable for the ir extract and well beingAccording to Plato , the city (the state ) includes the individuals . Thus a just city automatically means happy individuals . Every citizen , no matter his status must respect the law . expiration against the law means doing wrong to the city and thus to its citizens . Socrates believes that the close to worthful possession of an individual is not a square one , but his own soul Wealth does not stick about excellence , but excellence makes wealthiness and everything else good for men , both individually and collectively (Plato , 33...If you requirement to vanquish a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay