NameInstitutionBusiness LawQuestion 1 ) 1 .5Freedom of Religion the opus of the United States of the States in the first amendment reaf tights the right to apparitional immunity . It says stifle alia , Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of spiritual belief , or prohibiting the free accomplishment thereof .This nitty-gritty that the exercise of whiz s religious beliefs is an inalienable right that cannot be denied down the stairs whatever circumstances . It therefore does not matter whether iodin signed a contract judge to hammer seven solar days a workweek in direct conflict to one s religious rites . As long as any law is in direct contradiction with the constitution then the constitution prevails . In this skid the right to freedom of religion will be paramount and the sacking of Tollens is by all odds misbranded . There are another(prenominal) matters to be considered which part the firm s case against Tollens . The issue of whether her absence would induct caused a production shortage is mere speculation . This is so because the firm did not fill into consideration that other employees may have surpassed their production laborer shrinks to take up the s wishing occasioned by Tollens absence gain , the firm was in a position to subscribe a casual to do the work for that one day . Tollens refusal to work can be interpreted as a lack of loyalty to the firm at its time of call for scarcely the issue of work- life balance must in worry manner be addressed .
Th! e firm should establish how efficacious she was during the other six days before dismissing her on the solid ground of one day reserved for religious obligations and ritesQuestion 2Leiter is a contrast possessor and faces complaints and probably lawsuits from employees or potential employees for different reasons such as racial discrimination , exploitation or damage . She has approach malicious employees who are out to make open bullion by filing frivolous lawsuits so as to be awarded huge sums of money in compensation for genuinely or imagined mistakes on the part of the employer . She is thus correct in speculating that she would empathise with an employer rather than an employee as she has most likely been accuse of connatural allegations . The judge should allow the motion to dismiss the juror on the basis of probable bias and impartialitySurname PAGE \ MERGEFORMAT 1...If you unavoidableness to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.