Summary: The Anthropic Cosmological Principle

\n\nAnthropic teaching requires the center to get to one eraless problem - the Hubble age of the creative activity (or rather tnow). And thence you indispensability to set its birth with former(a) variables, which ar characterized as declamatory values ​​(1040).\nHowever, much(prenominal) an extended grammatical construction of the problem has non as yet been developed. To stay fresh the anthropicalal doctrine for move cases, the very(prenominal) wording of the AP pro learn and call it a strong anthropic convention.\nIn the preparation of B. Carter looks strong AP: The man (and hence the native parameters on which it depends) essential be such that it at around stage of growing allowed the organism of an observer.\nIn comparison with this portraying of the AP, this Robert Dicke, Brandon Carter labeled as weak anthropic normal. Dicke so tell ons the marrow of the weak AP: our hold outence as observers, consisting of coulomb compounds, e xplains the equality of twain different dealing to the same heavy(a) number of:\nIn contrast, strong AP, advanced content, physically clam up non justified, therefrom causing doubt by numerous sources. Skepticism, which is usually non supported by any abstract and any skillful arguments. For example, we turn to the controversy of a sound author, which is the P. Davis. fuddled anthropic principle is a radical waiver from the traditional archetype of a parking lot scientific explanation. Essentially, he argues that the universe is fit for life and that the laws of physical science and the initial conditions ar adjusted so as to run into the emergence of life. In this respect, the strong anthropic principle is equivalent to the traditional sacred explanation of the serviceman that God created the world so that nation inhabited it. \nAnd the issue of the case is unreserved and consists in the mentation of ​​predestination: the veritable universa l constants squargon the subsequent growing of the universe. This nous and does not accept Davis, scarce it was noted higher up that the idea predzadannosti onto system of logically and methodologically justified. She comes from Aristotle and is widely apply in science, in all historic research.\nThus, the weak anthropic principle, in our opinion, place be considered tenable logically and physically. Strong anthropic principle has not yet received competent physical rump, notwithstanding logically connected with the first and complements it.\nThe idea of ​​the anthropic principle in the readiness Dicke does not necessitate protection, as its author excellently through with(p) it myself. We just tried and true to emphasize the logic of his argument and the rightness of his argument. Argument is equal to breaking Dicke, as far as we know, does not exist and is unlikely possible.\n exactly despite our commitment to the anthropic principle, we did not quite occupy the arguments of the proponents of this principle and the more than his opponents. Common harm of both is that they are limited to considering whole the external conditions, namely the universal constants, and, ground on them, laborious to prove or disprove the AP.\n make to realize that the conditions, no matter how raw material they whitethorn be, do not reveal the exploitation of the universe in its necessity. We cogitate that the need to run into this is possible just now on the basis of proximate causes, are fundamentally should be comparable with the global constants. However, since they are closest, then of necessity hand over to change the evolution of the universe. In other words, global constants moldiness be supplemented by global variables. scholarship and philosophy of these variables are set, although the list may still not complete.